I was a broke college student learning wonderful and useful stuff like Beta, CAPM, ETF portfolio management, etc. Anyway, just a couple of years earlier, I read The Intelligent Investor so I was a value investor at heart.As part of the curriculum, we ran a virtual portfolio in which we talked about our strategy, holdings, and performance at the end of the semester.
I remember I decided to go with a concentrated portfolio of 5 stocks. If I remember correctly, it was WFC, USB, eBay, and two others. These purchases were made almost at the absolute bottom of the crash. Because my portfolio had 2 financials, my results were mixed but anyway, I remember getting dinged for not diversifying and having too much beta when other students over diversified and/or day traded.
Boy would I love to see my portfolio performance now. I mean, WFC was in the low 20's, and eBay around $10.
Any of those strategies can be successful or fail spectacularly over a 1 or 2 semester course. Did they make you do any back tests, forward projections, compare the different methodologies?
No. It was basically a "run a portfolio, make a presentation detailing your performance and strategy." I remember being one of the few to actually have a long term strategy.
did you think you came away from that course with a better understanding of how markets work and the strategies one can employ? Which strategies seem to be the most productive?
Better understanding, yes. But in the back of my mind, I knew successful investors didn't use CAPM,MPT or Beta, so I wasn't too happy about them spending a great of time on them. I did have a professor who focused on DCF and valuation. So I tried to take him as much as possible. Coincidentally, he had the most "real world" experience and managed a portfolio for a private equity group.